The court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous because the charge-sheet had been submitted, rendering the petition moot. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15687 of 2017
Petitioner :- Dr. Mohd. Ayub Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case, hence the present petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 30.5.2018 A. Mandhani
Dr. Mohd. Ayub
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Dinesh Kumar Singh-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
