Contempt application dismissed because judgment of District Consumer Redressal Forum had already been executed. No concurrent contempt proceedings initiated.
None. Application dismissed with no orders granting specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3140 of 2018
Applicant :- Sudhakar Pandey Opposite Party :- Vijay Kumar Mittal And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhakar Pandey
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard Sri Sudhakar Pandey, Advocate, who has appeared in person.
It is not disputed that the judgment of the District Consumer Redressal Forum has already been put into execution. Consequently, the Court finds no ground to initiate parallel proceedings for contempt.
The petition is consequently dismissed .
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 Arun K. Singh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether court should initiate contempt proceedings given prior execution of judgment
Sudhakar Pandey
Vijay Kumar Mittal
4 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
