No. The applicant failed to respond. The opposite party submitted an order showing the applicants' claim was disposed of. The court held nothing further survives and dismissed the contempt application.
Nothing further survives; case disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2610 of 2018
Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Singh And Another Opposite Party :- Vishal Singh, Secretary Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Mohan Misra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has not responded even in the revised call.
Shri Vivek Verma, learned counsel has appeared on instructions of the opposite party and has placed on the record a copy of the order dated 24 May 2018 which is marked as 'X' for the purposes of identification. In terms of the said order, the claim of the applicants has been duly attended to and disposed of.
Consequently nothing further survives on this petition which shall stand disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 nethra
Manoj Kumar Singh And Another
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
