Allowed

vinod v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Feb 2018BAIL/4132/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed bail to the applicant Vinod in a cheating and robbery case involving non-bailable warrant due to unable to appear. Granted bail subject to strict conditions on attendance, no adjournments at evidence, and speedy trial completion within one year.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to strict conditions regarding attendance and no adjournments during evidence.

vinod Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4132 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Vinod Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Shyam Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the due to some unavoidable circumstances, the applicant could not appear before the court on the dates fixed. It has further been stated that due to non appearance, non bailable warrant was issued against the applicant and in pursuance of the same, he was arrested on 03.12.2017 and the trial is in progress. The applicant undertakes to appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed by the trial court. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent. The applicant is in jail since 03.12.2017.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Vinod involved in Case Crime No. 94 of 1999, under Section 394, 411 & 120B I.P.C., Police Station Muradnagar, District Ghaziabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶14

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the present case and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.

¶15

Order Date :- 5.2.2018 Arti Sharma

vinod v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

vinod v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

zakir alias chuhha Vs State of U.P.

Shaukeen Vs State of U.P.

raju jatav Vs State of U.P.

sonu Vs State of U.P.

sunny Vs State of U.P.

Bhupendra Singh and Another Vs State of U.P.