Allowed

raju jatav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Feb 2018BAIL/3827/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3827 of 2018, the Court granted bail to the applicant Raju Jatav, upholding arguments for parity with a co-accused. The applicant, charged under IPC Sections 457, 380, and 411, was released on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount.

raju jatav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3827 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Raju Jatav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Prem Narayan Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Prem Narayan Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Indal having similar role has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 17.08.2017 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29246 of 2017 and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 26.08.2017.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Raju Jatav involved in Case Crime No. 41 of 2017, under Section 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., Police Station New Agra, District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 2.2.2018

¶16

Arti Sharma

raju jatav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

raju jatav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

furkan Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Khalik Vs State of U.P.

Saurabh Vs State of U.P.

zakir alias chuhha Vs State of U.P.

Shaukeen Vs State of U.P.

Ramesh Yadav @ Gautam Vs State of U.P.