Allowed

Bhupendra Singh and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Feb 2018BAIL/4116/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court granted bail to the applicants invoking parity with a co-accused. The court expressed prima facie satisfaction regarding the charge under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471. Consequently, the applicants were released on personal bond with two sureties each upon furnishing a bond, subject to specific conditions to appear in trial and not tamper with wi

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on bail on a personal bond with two sureties each in like amount, subject to conditions regarding attendance and non-tampering with witnesses.

Bhupendra Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4116 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Bhupendra Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Shailendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the coaccused Yogesh Kumar having similar role has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 04.01.2017 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 111 of 2017 and the case of the applicants stand on identical footing, hence the applicants are also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicants are in jail since 09.01.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicants Bhupendra Singh and Bhupendra involved in Case Crime No. 187 of 2016, under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Kannauj, District Kannauj be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

The applicants will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

They will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

They will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 5.2.2018 Arti Sharma

Bhupendra Singh and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhupendra Singh and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

zakir alias chuhha Vs State of U.P.

Shaukeen Vs State of U.P.

raju jatav Vs State of U.P.

vinod Vs State of U.P.

sonu Vs State of U.P.

sunny Vs State of U.P.