Allowed

Nishant v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Aug 2018BAIL/30805/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30805 of 2018, the Court granted bail to the applicant Nishant, accused under Sections 380 and 411 IPC, subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond and sureties, and prohibiting tampering with evidence or committing further crimes.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Nishant Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30805 of 2018 Applicant :- Nishant Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶2

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶3

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Nishant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 10 of 2018, under Sections 380, 411 IPC, Police Station G.R.P. Baraut, District- Baghpat, during pendency of trial.

¶4

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the first information report. He has been subsequently arrested by the police. The recovery of two mobile phones has been shown from the applicant. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. The applicant is languishing in jail since 05.6.2018. He does not have any criminal history to his credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶5

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6

Having considered the submissions of the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Nishant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶7

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶8

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶9

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶10

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶11

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶12

Order Date :- 16.8.2018 Ruchi Agrahari

Nishant v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nishant v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh Singh Vs State of U.P. and Others

Deepanshu Vs State of U.P.

Gaus Mohammad Vs Smt. Badrunisa

Dharmendra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Ram Sajiwan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nageshwar Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P.