Allowed

Deepanshu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 Aug 2018BAIL/30580/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was filed by Deepanshu seeking release during the pendency of trial in a case involving offenses under Sections 395/397/412/427 IPC. The court granted bail on the grounds of parity with a co-accused who had already been released, permitting the applicant to navigate the trial process on similar terms.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Deepanshu was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties with specific conditions regarding conduct during the trial period.

Deepanshu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30580 of 2018 Applicant :- Deepanshu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶4

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Deepanshu with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 124 of 2018, under Sections 395/397/412/427 IPC, Police Station Ecotech-3rd, District Gautam Budh Nagar , during pendency of trial.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused Asif has been granted bail by this Court on 13.7.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.20224 of 2018, a copy of the said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.4.2018. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶7

Let the applicant Deepanshu involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶8

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶9

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶10

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶11

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶12

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶13

Order Date :- 14.8.2018

¶14

Ruchi Agrahari

Deepanshu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepanshu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Rizwan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dukali Devi and Others Vs State of U.P. and Others

Kamal Ahsan Vs State of U.P.

Ashutosh Singh Vs State of U.P. and Others

Gaus Mohammad Vs Smt. Badrunisa

Kunwar Bahadur Vs State of U.P. and Another