Allowed

Gulab Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Jul 2018BAIL/27487/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court applied for bail to an applicant with no criminal history. The judge, without expressing an opinion on case merits, granted bail. The court imposed standard conditions regarding tampering with evidence, cooperation, and refraining from further crimes.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in Crime No. 40 of 2018 under sections 143, 436, I.P.C. with personal bond and two sureties.

Gulab Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27487 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Gulab Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Mohan Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The FIR was initially lodged against six persons including the applicant. It has been stated in paragraph 12 of the affidavit, filed in support of the bail application, that four co-accused have been exonerated by the Investigating Officer, but the applicant has been implicated. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and is in jail since 19.5.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶9

Let the applicant Gulab Yadav be released on bail in Case Crime No. 40 of 2018, under sections 143, 436, I.P.C, P.S. Shohratgarh, District Siddharth Nagar on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶14

Order Date :- 24.7.2018 T. Sinha

Gulab Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulab Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazim Khan Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay @ Suleman and Another Vs State of U.P.

Sita Ram Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Vs State of U.P.

Jahid Alam Vs State of U.P.

Manoj Kumar @ Abhay Pratap Vs State of U.P.