Allowed

Nazim Khan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Jul 2018BAIL/11583/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11583 of 2018, the court granted bail to the applicant, Nazim Khan, in a case involving theft and forest offense. The applicant was accused of false implication and had a criminal history. The application was disposed of by directing his release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in Case Crime No. 62 of 2018 by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount.

Nazim Khan Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11583 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Nazim Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Mishra,Mirza Ali Zulfaqar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The argument of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case along with stolen goods. There is criminal history of the applicant of three cases, which has been explained in paragraph 15, 16 and 17 of the affidavit, filed in support of the bail application. This is the first implication of the applicant in the case of this nature. The applicant is in jail since 11.2.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶9

Let the applicant Nazim Khan be released on bail in Case Crime No. 62 of 2018, under sections 379, 411, I.P.C and Section 26, 41, 42, 52 of Forest Act, P.S. Bilaspur, District Rampur on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶14

Order Date :- 23.7.2018 T. Sinha

Nazim Khan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nazim Khan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kalawati Devi and Anr. Vs Lallan and Ors.

Superintending Engineer P.T.W. Vs M/S Crust Cables and Another

Km. Rajni Vs Ashok Kumar and Others

Gulshan @ Pooja Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay @ Suleman and Another Vs State of U.P.

Sita Ram Vs State of U.P.