Sita Ram v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court granted bail to the applicant, an agent of a Chit Fund Company, accused of cheating and forgery involving the collection and deposit of funds, upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
What did the court decide?
Release of the applicant on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount, subject to specific conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13046 of 2018
Applicant :- Sita Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Hirdesh Kumar Yadav,Aravind Kumar Maurya,Sushma Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The informant is an agent of the Chit Fund Company and the applicant is also an agent.
The allegation is that all the agents have collected Rs.50,00,000/- and deposited the same in the account of the company. The applicant has no prior criminal history and is in jail since 17.2.2018.
On the other hand learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Sita Ram be released on bail in Case Crime No. 292 of 2017, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, I.P.C., Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in case of alleged forgery and cheating offences.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sita Ram
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/13046/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court