Allowed

Gulshan @ Pooja v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Jul 2018BAIL/27373/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the applicant, Gulshan @ Pooja, in a cheating and forgery case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, relying on parity with a co-accused who was already on bail, subject to standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence and seeking adjournments.

Gulshan @ Pooja Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27373 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Gulshan @ Pooja Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Gulshan @ Pooja with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No.71 of 2018 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B I.P.C. , Police Station Civil Lines, District Moradabad, during pendency of trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused Kasim Alias Sameer has been granted bail by this Court on 17.7.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.20869 of 2018, a copy of the said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.02.2018. There is no criminal history to her credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶8

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶9

Let the applicant Gulshan @ Pooja involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶14

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶15

Order Date :- 23.7.2018 Ruchi Agrahari

Gulshan @ Pooja v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulshan @ Pooja v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kalawati Devi and Anr. Vs Lallan and Ors.

Superintending Engineer P.T.W. Vs M/S Crust Cables and Another

Km. Rajni Vs Ashok Kumar and Others

Nazim Khan Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay @ Suleman and Another Vs State of U.P.

Sita Ram Vs State of U.P.