Allowed

Raju Verma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jun 2018BAIL/22583/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was heard by Hon'ble Siddharth, J. The applicant contended his innocence and lack of criminal history, while the State opposed, citing supply of contraband. The court granted bail with personal bond, sureties, and specific conditions to prevent tampering and future crime.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to specified conditions regarding non-tampering and future conduct.

Raju Verma Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 33

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22583 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Raju Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Kumar,Rakesh Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Satya Prakash Rathore holding brief of Sri Narendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and victimize him. There is no implication of the applicant prior to this incident. The applicant who is in jail since 19.05.2018 having no criminal history to his credit, deserves to be released on bail. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage who is involved in supplying contraband, therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activity.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Raju Verma involved in case crime No. 104 of

¶9

2018, under Sections 354, 354Ka, 323, 504, 506, 452 IPC and Section 7/8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), Police Station- Poonchh, DistrictJhansi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶14

Order Date :- 20.6.2018 S. Thakur

Raju Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Laxmi Maurya Vs State of U.P.

Govind Vs State of U.P.

Rameshwar Kushwaha Vs State of U.P.

Ravindra Vs State of U.P.

Wasim Vs State of U.P.

Nooruddeen Vs State of U.P.