Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Court No. - 33

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22577 of 2018

Applicant :- Ravindra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is further submitted that the co-accused namely Deepak has already been enlarged on bail by another Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 19633 of 2018, vide order dated 24.05.2018. It is also submitted that the applicant has not committed the present offence. He does not have any criminal history to his credit. Applicant is languishing in jail since 29.03.2018 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage who is involved in supplying contraband, therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activity.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the