Govind v. State of U.P.

Court No. - 33

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22373 of 2018

Applicant :- Govind Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Bahadur Verma,Raj Kamal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Sri Raju Kanaujia, Advocate, has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The same is taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Raju Kanaujia, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the informant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. The applicant is languishing in jail since 09.04.2018. He does not have any criminal history to his credit. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail.

Having considered the submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Govind , involved in case crime No.87 of 2018, under section 307 I.P.C, PS Thathiya, District Kannauj, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-