Allowed

Sunil v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC21 Aug 2018BAIL/19110/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail application filed by Sunil in a criminal case under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC. Relying on the principle of parity with a co-accused already granted bail, the court granted release on a personal bond and two sureties, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Sunil granted bail on personal bond with two sureties to be appointed in Case Crime No. 374 of 2014, subject to standard conditions.

Sunil Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19110 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Sunil Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 374 of 2014, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, District- Kanpur Nagar and is in jail since 21.08.2015, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused, Ram Kishan, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court by order dated 04.04.2017 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1898 of 2017. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Ram Kishan, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶8

The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.

¶10

In view of the above, let the applicant, Sunil be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 374 of 2014, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, District- Kanpur Nagar with the following conditions :-

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and cooperate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 21.8.2018 Rohit

Sunil v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Rahman Vs State of U.P.

Narendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and Others

State of U.P. Vs Salim Ansari and Others

Vikash Rai Vs State of U.P.

Vipin Verma Vs State of U.P.

Manohar Vs State of U.P. and Others