This Criminal Revision held infructuous and dismissed without issuing notices or passing interim orders, as the trial court had altered charges and the trial's status was unknown.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1085 of 2007
Revisionist :- State Of U.P. Opposite Party :- Salim Ansari & Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
This revision has been listed in the category of infructuous cases.
The order dated 11.1.2017 passed by the trial court has been challenged in this revision. By the aforesaid order the court below held that no offence under Section 307, IPC is made out against the accused persons and the trial was directed to be conducted under the remaining Sections i.e. 147, 148, 506, 353, 342, 336, 323, 427, IPC and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act. No interim order has been passed in this revision nor notices have been issued to the opposite parties till date. It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Even otherwise the revision is listed in the category of infructuous cases.
Revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.8.2018 T. Sinha
State Of U.P.
Salim Ansari
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
