This was an infructuous criminal revision where no one appeared for the revisionist. The court dismissed the case as infructuous.
The revision petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1075 of 2007
Revisionist :- Narendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Revisionist :- R.P. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
This case is listed under the Heading of infructuous cases (without objection).
List has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.8.2018 T. Sinha
State Of U.P.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
