The Court rejected a bail application filed in 2015 which was not pressed by the applicant's counsel. The Court referred to Supreme Court directions for speedy disposal but noted the absence of the applicant.
The bail application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1428 of 2015
Applicant :- Ravindra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- V.S. Parmar,Vivek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. is present.
The Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (CRIMINAL) Diary No. 36869 of 2017 (Sanjay Dubey @ Rajesh Dubey vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Anti Corruption Bureau Ghaziabad) in the order dated 29.11.2017 has observed for disposal of bail matters within a period of one month, in the following terms:-
"In judgement of this Court in Hussain and Another vs. Union of India (2017) 5 SCC 702, this Court observed that in view of mandate of Article 21, the High Courts may dispose of the bail matters within a period of one month..."
In the instant case, the bail application is pending since 2015.
No one is present to press it.
Accordingly, the bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 5.1.2018 Digamber
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the bail application pending since 2015 given the absence of the applicant.
Ravindra
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
Parties & counsel
