Sunil v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge court rejected a bail application pending since 2014 due to non-appearance of the applicant to press the matter in the revised call.
What the court decided
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16450 of 2014
Applicant :- Sunil Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Shukla,P.K. Sharma,Pankaj Kr.Sharma,S.K. Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application even in the revised call.
The Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (CRIMINAL) Diary No. 36869 of 2017 (Sanjay Dubey @ Rajesh Dubey vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Anti Corruption Bureau Ghaziabad) in the order dated 29.11.2017 has observed for disposal of bail matters within a period of one month, in the following terms:-
"In judgement of this Court in Hussain and Another vs. Union of India (2017) 5 SCC 702, this Court observed that in view of mandate of Article 21, the High Courts may dispose of the bail matters within a period of one month ............"
In the instant case, the bail application is pending since 2014. No one is present to press it.
Accordingly, the bail application is rejected.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sunil
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/16450/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court