The High Court dismissed a bail application because no one appeared to represent the applicant. The court noted the application had been pending since 2015, referencing relevant Supreme Court directions to dispose of bail matters within one month.
The bail application was rejected due to the absence of the applicant's representative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1151 of 2015
Applicant :- Hemu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Brij Lal Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. is present.
The Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (CRIMINAL) Diary No. 36869 of 2017 (Sanjay Dubey @ Rajesh Dubey vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Anti Corruption Bureau Ghaziabad) in the order dated 29.11.2017 has observed for disposal of bail matters within a period of one month, in the following terms:-
"In judgement of this Court in Hussain and Another vs. Union of India (2017) 5 SCC 702, this Court observed that in view of mandate of Article 21, the High Courts may dispose of the bail matters within a period of one month..."
In the instant case, the bail application is pending since 2015.
No one is present to press it.
Accordingly, the bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 5.1.2018 Digamber
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be rejected because no one was present to press it.
Whether the bail application should be disposed of in light of its long pending status since 2015.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hussain and Another vs. Union of IndiaReferred¶6
Hussain and Another vs. Union of India (2017) 5 SCC 702 · Who else cites this
Sanjay Dubey @ Rajesh Dubey vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶6
Special Leave Petition (CRIMINAL) Diary No. 36869 of 2017 (Sanjay Dubey @ Rajesh Dubey vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Anti Corruption Bureau Ghaziabad)
Hему
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
Parties & counsel
