Allowed

Saudan Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Aug 2018BAIL/12767/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court allowed bail to the applicant Saudan Singh in a criminal appeal regarding Case Crime No. 997 of 2016. Bail was granted based on parity with a co-accused and the applicant's clean criminal record, subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing personal bond and two sureties, each in like amount, subject to specific conditions regarding evidence tampering and conduct.

Saudan Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12767 of 2018 Applicant :- Saudan Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pandey Balkrishna Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶4

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Saudan Singh with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.997 of 2016, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Shahganj, District Agra , during pendency of trial.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused Sarnam Singh has been granted bail by this Court on 12.3.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9263 of 2018, a copy of the said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 21.12.2017. There is no criminal history to his credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶7

Let the applicant Saudan Singh involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶8

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶9

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶10

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶11

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶12

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶13

Order Date :- 2.8.2018 Ruchi Agrahari

Saudan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saudan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra @ Baingan Vs State of U.P.

Vishwanath Vs State of U.P.

shesh mani alias dev raj patel and another Vs State of U.P.

Rahil Vs State of U.P.

Ankush Vs State of U.P.

Avinash Sharma Vs State of U.P.