Allowed

Avinash Sharma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Aug 2018BAIL/28520/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed bail to the applicant Avinash Sharma on the ground of parity with a co-accous who was already released on bail by this Court. The applicant was released on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties subject to standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed. Applicant released on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount satisfying the court concerned with specified conditions.

Avinash Sharma Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28520 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Avinash Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- A.K.Umrao Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶7

The argument is that the co-accused Amit Kumar Yadav has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 25.06.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.23246 of 2018. The prayer for release of the applicant on bail on the ground of parity has been made. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.04.2018.

¶8

On the other hand learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the fact that the identically placed co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Avinash Sharma , involved in case crime No.165 of 2012, under section 392 I.P.C, Police Station, Quarsi District Aligarh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶11

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶12

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶13

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the

¶14

date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶15

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.

¶16

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.

¶18

Order Date :- 2.8.2018

¶19

Avinash Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avinash Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra @ Baingan Vs State of U.P.

Vishwanath Vs State of U.P.

shesh mani alias dev raj patel and another Vs State of U.P.

Rahil Vs State of U.P.

Ankush Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Shradha Goyal and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another