Allowed

Ravindra @ Baingan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Aug 2018BAIL/28894/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted bail to the applicant, Ravindra @ Baignan, in a criminal case involving sections 395, 412, and 342 IPC, ordering release on personal bond and sureties with specific conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and further criminal activity.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties with specific conditions including no tampering with evidence and no further criminal activities.

Ravindra @ Baingan Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28894 of 2018 Applicant :- Ravindra @ Baingan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶4

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ravindra @ Baingan with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.903 of 2017, under Sections 395, 412, 342 IPC, Police Station Kasna, District Gautam Budh Nagar , during pendency of trial.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused Kuldeep and Surjeet @ Bhura have been granted bail by this Court on 24.5.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15250 of 2018, a copy of the said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 28.11.2017. Criminal history of the applicant has properly been explained by the learned counsel for the applicant in paragraph No.9 of the affidavit in support of the bail application. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶6

Let the applicant Ravindra @ Baingan involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶7

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶8

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶9

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶10

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶11

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶12

Order Date :- 1.8.2018 Ruchi Agrahari

Ravindra @ Baingan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra @ Baingan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahipal Singh Vs State of U.P.

Vinod Gaur Vs State of U.P.

Ansarullah Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Nadeem Vs State of U.P.

Ankush Vs State of U.P.

Atul Shukla Vs State of U.P.