Bal Kishan and Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5982 of…
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5982 of…
Petition dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5982 of 2006
Applicant :- Bal Kishan & Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- V.P. Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
This case has been consistently adjourned on the ground of illness-slip of learned counsel for the applicants. Even on the last date of listing, it was observed by this Court that on the next date of listing, the illness-slip will not be appreciated by this Court.
Today, again none present on behalf of applicants even in revised list.
It appears that matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time and it seems that applicants are no more interested in pursing the matter.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 19.4.2018
Ajeet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bal Kishan & Others
State Of U.P.
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court