A Section 482 Cr.P.C. application was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution because no applicant lawyer was present to press it after it was called out in the revised list.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12098 of 2006
Applicant :- Vishwanath & Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Sahai,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Sujeet Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the " Group of cases likely to be infructuous ".
The case is listed under the heading of "Group of Cases U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (likely to be infructuous)".
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicants to press this petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 19.4.2018
Ajeet
Vishwanath
Others
State Of U.P.
Another
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
