The High Court dismissed the application under Section 482 of the CrPC for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14575 of 2006
Applicant :- Munkad Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- N.I. Jafri Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
List has been revised. None has appeared to press this application on behalf of the applicant despite repeated calls. Learned A.G.A. is present.
The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
It may be observed that if some recall application is moved in future that shall be placed before appropriate Bench. This matter shall not be treated as tied up or part heard with his Bench because the case is being dismissed not on merits.
Office is directed to communicate this order forthwith to the lower court concerned.
Order Date :- 6.9.2018 CPP/-
Munkad Ali
Karuna Nand Bajpayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
