Learned counsel for the applicant has not been able to point out any such illegality, impropriety or incorrectness much less than any abuse of the court's process which may persuade this Court to quash the charge sheet or the impugned proceedings. In fact, the only thing that has been prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant-accused is a lawyer and, therefore, a liberal view may be taken in the matter. This Court can not subscribe to such kind of view . Law does not discriminate between the offenders on the basis of profession. The guilt or innocence of the accused is to be adjudged on the basis of material and evidence collected during the course of investigation against him regardless of the fact that how highly placed person in the society he is or as to what is his profession. In fact, the application shows that the evidence collected during the investigation on the basis of which the charge sheet has been submitted, has not been furnished along with this application and, therefore, there is absolutely no basis to argue that the chargesheet is not based on sufficient material or evidence. The validity of the charge sheet will depend upon the nature of evidence collected against the accused that can be adjudged by the Court only after the same is furnished along with this application. If the accused or his counsel does not choose to furnish the material which was collected during the course of investigation that will not go to show that there was no evidence collected during the course of investigation or the charge sheet was not submitted on any cogent material.
