The single-judge court dismissed a Section 482 CrPC application as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to the applicants' absence and the efflux of time.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7947 of 2006
Applicant :- Suraj Pal & Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Sisodia,Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicants to press this petition.
It appears that matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time and it seems that applicants are no more interested in pursing the matter.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 13.4.2018 Ajeet
Suraj Pal & Others
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
