In a Section 482 CrPC application where no applicants were present, the Single Judge dismissed the petition as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to alleged efflux of time and lack of interest.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12276 of 2006
Applicant :- Girish Mohan & Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- S.C. Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicants to press this petition.
It appears that matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time and it seems that applicants are no more interested in pursing the matter.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 12.4.2018
Ajeet
Girish Mohan & Another
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
