Single judge dismissed S. 482 Cr.P.C. application as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to none-being-present and efflux-of-time, vacating interim order with liberty for recall.
Petition dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11356 of 2006
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Patel And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- B.R. Verma,G.P. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicants to press this petition.
It appears that matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time and it seems that applicants is no more interested in pursing the matter.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 11.4.2018
Ajeet
Anil Kumar Patel And Others
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
