The division bench dismissed the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous and for want of prosecution without hearing. An interim order, if any, was vacated.
Application dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11415 of 2006
Applicant :- Hasmuddin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the heading of "Group of cases U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (likely to be infructuous)".
None appears to press this petition even in revised list.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case cause of action still survives and it has not become infructuous, applicant will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 11.4.2018 Ranjeet Sahu
Hasmuddin
State Of U.P.
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
