Section 4. Exchange of specified bank notes
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 3, the following persons holding specified bank notes on or before the 8th day of November, 2016 shall be entitled to tender within the grace period with such declarations or statements, at such offices of the Reserve Bank or in such other manner as may be specified by it, namely:—
(i) a citizen of India who makes a declaration that he was outside India between the 9th November, 2016 to 30th December, 2016, subject to such conditions as may be specified, by notification, by the Central Government; or
(ii) such class of persons and for such reasons as may be specified by notification, by the Central Government.
(2) The Reserve Bank may, if satisfied, after making such verifications as it may consider necessary that the reasons for failure to deposit the notes within the period specified in the notification referred to in section 3, are genuine, credit the value of the notes in his Know Your Customer compliant bank account in such manner as may be specified by it.
(3) Any person, aggrieved by the refusal of the Reserve Bank to credit the value of the notes under sub-section (2), may make a representation to the Central Board of the Reserve Bank within fourteen days of the communication of such refusal to him.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, the expression "Know Your Customer compliant bank account" means the account which complies with the conditions specified in the regulations made by the Reserve Bank under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949).
Judgements applying section 4
NC: 2025:KHC:47245 WP No. 14129 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14129 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NILKANTH PAWA
DisposedOpenFive-Judge Constitution Bench answered a reference on the validity of Notification No. 3407(E) dated 8-11-2016 demonetising all series of Rs.500/- and Rs.1,000/- bank notes under s.26(2) of the RBI Act, 1934. MAJORITY (B.R. Gavai, J. for himself, S. Abdul Nazeer, A.S. Bopanna and V.
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28211 of 2020 Applicant :- Bhav Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghubir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for th
AllowedOpenof 2019 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.19050 of 2019 Decided on: 02.05.2019 Mohammad Mushetkin ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present : M
AllowedOpen