Section 2. Definitions
(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) "appointed day" means the 31st day of December, 2016;
(b) "grace period" means the period to be specified by the Central Government, by notification, during which the specified bank notes can be deposited in accordance with this Act;
(c) "notification" means a notification published in the Official Gazette;
(d) "Reserve Bank" means the Reserve Bank of India constituted by the Central Government under section 3 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934);
(e) "specified bank note" means a bank note of the denominational value of five hundred rupees or one thousand rupees of the series existing on or before the 8th day of November, 2016.
(2) The words and expressions used and not defined in this Act but defined in the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934) or the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in those Acts.
Judgements applying section 2
Ita 2038/BANG/2025 of Prathamika Krishi Pattina Sahakari Sangh Niyamit Hulgur,Hulgur versus Income Tax Officer, WARD-1,, Davangere
Outcome: DisposedPRATHAMIKA KRISHI PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT HULGUR,HULGUR versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, DAVANGERE
DisposedOpenPUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 219 CWP-8372-2022 Date of Decision: 24.10.2024 RAJ KUMAR ... Petitioner VERSUS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. B.S.
DisposedOpenPage 1 of 3 $~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14496/2022 PRAHLAD AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Diwan, Mr. Brajesh Dwivedi, Mr. Mayank Verma, Mr. Rohan Tandon, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Writ Petition (Civil)Openof 2019 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.19050 of 2019 Decided on: 02.05.2019 Mohammad Mushetkin ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present : M
AllowedOpenCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.02.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ No. 129/2018 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Saini S/o Jamna Lal Saini, R/o 88-89 Sumer Nagar, Extension Jaipur, Mansarover, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajastha
AllowedOpen
Show 3 more
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6974/2018 INDU SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Meena Devi, Mr Manish Malik, Mr Ashok Kumar Dhull and Mr jai Subhash Thakur, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGAIOTN (JAIPUR) & ANR .....
Writ Petition (Civil)OpenCOURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2017/21ST ASHADHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 18107 of 2017 (K) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : -------------
DisposedOpenCOURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/24TH JYAISHTA, 1939 WP(C).No. 1616 of 2017 (R) ---------
DisposedOpen