Section 6. Grounds of detention severable
Where a person has been detained in pursuance of an order of detention under sub-section (1) of section 3 which has been made on two or more grounds, such order of detention shall be deemed to have been made separately on each of such grounds and accordingly
(a) such order shall not be deemed to be invalid or inoperative merely because one or some of the grounds is or are
(i) vague,
(ii) non-existent,
(iii) not relevant,
(iv) not connected or not proximately connected with such person, or
(v) invalid for any other reason whatsoever,
and it is not therefore possible to hold that the Government or officer making such order would have been satisfied as provided in sub-section (1) of section 3 with reference to the remaining ground or grounds and made the order of detention;
(b) the Government or officer making the order of detention shall be deemed to have made the order of detention under the said sub-section (1) after being satisfied as provided in that sub-section with reference to the remaining ground or grounds.
Judgements applying section 6
Kuleshwar Yadav Alias Kaleshwar Yadav Alias Koleshwar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand
Outcome: DismissedJharkhand HC (DB), W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.121 of 2026, decided 21/07/2026 — Kuleshwar Yadav @ Kaleshwar Yadav @ Koleshwar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors: preventive detention under S. 3(1) PITNDPS Act, 1988; effect of bail and post-order acquittals on validity of detention;
DismissedOpenSRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA + WRIT PETITION No. 23639 of 2025 % 08.07.2026 Between: Dunga Kumari .....PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ....RESPONDENTS ! Counsel for the Petit
DismissedOpenCOURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.WP No. 22 of 2026 Decided on : 04.06.2026 Raj Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.
DisposedOpenMithilesh Tiwari Vs Union of India through the Zonal Director Narcotics Control Bureau Ranchi
Outcome: AllowedMithilesh Tiwari v. Union of India (through Zonal Director, NCB Ranchi) and PITNDPS authorities (Joint Secretary & Deputy Secretary, Dept. of Revenue), W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.792 of 2025, High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; coram Sujit Narayan Prasad & Arun Kumar Rai, JJ.; C.A.V. 17.02.2026, pronounced 12/03/2026.
AllowedOpenPITNDPS Act 1988 Section 3(1) preventive detention quashed; non-application of mind by detaining authority; live link lost — no FIR after March 2024 till detention order 06.12.2025;
DisposedOpenBipin Bihari Singh @ Dipu Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand through Secretary Department of Home , Government of Jharkhand
Outcome: DismissedJharkhand High Court, W.P.(Cr.)(DB) No.662 of 2025, decided 06/01/2026 (C.A.V. 08.12.2025). Preventive detention under Section 3(1) PITNDPS Act 1988; unreasonable delay between detention proposal (memo no.
DismissedOpen
Show 4 more
Rampravesh Gupta Alias Ramu Saw@ Ram Pravesh Saw @ Ram Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary
Outcome: AllowedW.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.133 of 2025, High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; C.A.V. on 17.07.2025, pronounced on 08/08/2025; coram Sujit Narayan Prasad and Rajesh Kumar, JJ.
AllowedOpenBanti Mahtha,Alias Sonu Mahthaa Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand
Outcome: AllowedJharkhand HC (Division Bench), pronounced 08.08.2025 (reserved/C.A.V. 17.07.2025), W.P.(Cr.) Nos.933 & 1001 of 2024: preventive detention orders under the PIT NDPS Act, 1988 (References No.18/PIT NDPS-25/2024-3616 and No.18/PIT NDPS-10/2024-2402, Principal Secretary, Home, Jail & Disaster Management Dept., Govt.
AllowedOpenSikandar Mahtha Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand
Outcome: AllowedPIT NDPS Act 1988 preventive detention quashed; subjective satisfaction vitiated by non-placement of acquittal and bail orders; more-than-six-month delay in executing detention orders (custody 25.12.2024 / 24.10.2024); Section 8 absconding procedure not invoked; Article 21 and Article 22(5);
AllowedOpenCOURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 10001 of 2025 Reserved on : 17.07.2025 Decided on : 31.07.2025 Jaspal Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
DisposedOpen