Section 10. Cases in which and circumstances under which persons may be detained for periods longer than three months without obtaining the opinion of Advisory Board
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any person (including a foreigner) in respect of whom an order of detention is made under this Act at any time before the 1 [31st day of July, 1999] may be detained without obtaining, in accordance with the provisions of sub-clause (a) of clause (4) of article 22 of the Constitution, the opinion of an Advisory Board for a period longer than three months but not exceeding six months from the date of his detention, where the order of detention has been made against such person with a view to preventing him from engaging in illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, and the Central Government or any officer of the Central Government, not below the rank of an Additional Secretary to that Government, specially empowered for the purposes of this section by that Government, is satisfied that such person engages or is likely to engage in illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances into, out of, through or within any area highly vulnerable to such illicit traffic and makes a declaration to that effect within five weeks of the detention of such person.
Explanation1.--In this sub-section, "area highly vulnerable to such illicit traffic" means--
(i) the India customs waters;
(ii) the customs airports;
(iii) the metropolitan cities of Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi, Madras and the city of Varanasi;
(iv) the inland area one hundred kilo metres in width from the coast of India falling within the territories of the States of Andhra Pradesh, Goa, Gujarat, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal and the Union territories of Daman and Diu and Pondicherry;
(v) the inland area one hundred kilo metres in width from--
(a) the India-Pakistan border in the States of Gujarat, Punjab and Rajasthan;
(b) the India-Nepal border in the States of Bihar, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal;
(c) the India-Burma border in the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland;
(d) the India-Bangladesh border in the States of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and West Bengal;
(e) the India-Bhutan border in the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Sikkim and West Bengal;
(vi) such other area or customs station, as the Central Government may, having regard to the vulnerability of such area or customs station, as the case may be, to illicit traffic, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf.
Explanation 2.--For the purposes of Explanation 1, "customs station" has the same meaning as in clause (13) of section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962).
(2) In the case of any person detained under a detention order to which the provisions of sub-section (1) apply, section 9 shall have effect subject to the following modifications, namely:--
(i) in clause (b), for the words "shall, within five weeks", the words "shall, within four months and two weeks" shall be substituted;
(ii) in clause (c),--
(a) for the words "the detention of the person concerned", the words "the continued detention of the person concerned" shall be substituted;
(b) for the words "eleven weeks", the words "five months and three weeks" shall be substituted;
(iii) in clause (f), for the words "for the detention", at both the places where they occur, the words "for the continued detention" shall be substituted.
Judgements applying section 10
Preventive detention — Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 — detention order dated 23.04.2026 passed by the Commissioner-cum-Detaining Authority, Jagdalpur Division (respondent No.2) in Istagasa Appeal No.
AllowedOpenBipin Bihari Singh @ Dipu Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand through Secretary Department of Home , Government of Jharkhand
Outcome: DismissedJharkhand High Court, W.P.(Cr.)(DB) No.662 of 2025, decided 06/01/2026 (C.A.V. 08.12.2025). Preventive detention under Section 3(1) PITNDPS Act 1988; unreasonable delay between detention proposal (memo no.
DismissedOpen2025:GAU-NL:486-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO. 20/2025 Shri Thangtinlen Changsan, aged about 28 years, Brother of Ch. Lamkhonei Khongsai, Res
DisposedOpenNAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 383 of 2025 Sanjay Sahu Son Of Kartik Ram Sahu Aged About 32 Years Resident Of Village Sasha Police Station -Pamgarh District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of
DismissedOpenNAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 317 of 2025 1 - Sanjay Sahu S/o Kartik Ram Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Sasha, Police Station - Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chh
DismissedOpenNAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 252 of 2025 Shatrughan Chandra S/o Mitthu @ Firatu Chandra Aged About 30 Years (Wrongly Mentioned as Shatruhan Chandra), R/o Jaijaipur, Police Station - Jaijaipur, District - Sakti (C.G.)
AllowedOpen
Show 4 more
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 233 of 2025 Vishnudas Vaishnav S/o Shri Nankidas Vaishnav Aged About 70 Years R/o Village- Semra, Police Station- Nawagarh, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State o
AllowedOpenNAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 97 of 2025 Ramesh Rathore S/o Shri Indal Rathore Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Ranijhap, Police Station Gaurela, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1.
AllowedOpenGauhati High Court, Kohima Bench (DB), judgment dated 04.04.2025 in W.P.(Crl.)/6/2025 and linked W.P.(Crl.)/4/2025; preventive detention under PITNDPS Act 1988 quashed; detenues in judicial custody; no cogent material showing likelihood of release on bail; mere ipse dixit grounds;
DisposedOpenNAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 474 of 2025 1 - Rajni Dubey S/o Late Ramesh Dubey Aged About 58 Years R/o Bhaisapasra P.S City Kotwali Balodabazar District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State o
DismissedOpen