Section 8. Orders for sale to be deemed decrees
Any order for sale made by the court under section 2, 3 or 4 shall be deemed to be a decree within the meaning of section 2 of the 1Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882).
Judgements applying section 8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:20.12.2024 Coram: THE
DismissedOpenPage 1 of 3 $~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 340/2019 & CM APPL. 17665/2019 SUGANDHA SETHI .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shoba Ramamoorthy and Mr. Gokula Krisnan, Advocates. versus SUDHIR PURI & ANR .....Respondents Through
Ct. 19 13.08.2024 In The High Court At Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) C.O. 2831 of 2024 Sri Lalit Mohan Ghosh & Ors. Vs. Sri Prdip Kumar Lala & Ors. Mr. Probal Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Susenjit Banik, Mr. Amit Ranja
DismissedOpen2024:KHC:28476-DB RFA No. 557 of 2016 C/W RFA No. 558 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI REGUL
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.10655 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. RAJASEKHAR ANDANURU @ R.B. ANDANUR S/O LATE ANDANURU BASAPPA
DismissedOpenU. DURGA PRASAD RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.307 of 2020 ORDER: Heard. At the out-set, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable in view of the fact that the impugned order dated 19.09.2019 in I.A.No.701 of
DismissedOpen
Show 4 more
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.9454 OF 2020(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RUKMINI, W/O LATE K NARAYANA DEVADIGA, AGED 98 YEARS, REP BY H
AllowedOpenCOURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1942 OP(C).No.1544 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.11.2018 IN O.S.NO.139/2016 OF MUNSIFF
DismissedOpenCOURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2684 of 2019 Nimai Mahato, aged about 48 years, son of Late Harijan Mahto, resident of Phulghar, Barwatand, P.S.-Tundi, P.O.-Maharajganj, District-Dhanbad. …… Petitioner/Defendant No.7 Versus 1. Jagar
DismissedOpen1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 4052-2019 Date of decision:-15.07.2019 Dr. Karamvir Arya ...Appellant Versus Dr. Ram Kumar Arya (deceased) through his LR's and ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE
DismissedOpen