Section 4. Order for payment of maintenance
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, where a Magistrate is satisfied that a divorced woman has not re-married and is not able to maintain herself after the iddat period, he may make an order directing such of her relatives as would be entitled to inherit her property on her death according to Muslim law to pay such reasonable and fair maintenance to her as he may determine fit and proper, having regard to the needs of the divorced woman, the standard of life enjoyed by her during her marriage and the means of such relatives and such maintenance shall be payable by such relatives in the proportions in which they would inherit he property and at such periods as he may specify in his order:
Provided that where such divorced woman has children, the Magistrate shall order only such children to pay maintenance to her, and in the event of any such children being unable to pay such maintenance, the Magistrate shall order the parents of such divorced woman to pay maintenance to her:
Provided further that if any of the parents is unable to pay his or her share of the maintenance ordered by the Magistrate on the ground of his or her not having the means to pay the same, the Magistrate may, on proof of such inability being furnished to him, order that the share of such relatives in the maintenance ordered by him be paid by such of the other relatives as may appear to the Magistrate to have the means of paying the same in such proportions as the Magistrate may think fit to order.
(2) Where a divorced woman is unable to maintain herself and she has no relatives as mentioned in sub-section (1) or such relatives or any one of them have not enough means to pay the maintenance ordered by the Magistrate or the other relatives have not the means to pay the shares of those relatives whose shares have been ordered by the Magistrate to be paid by such other relatives under the second proviso to sub-section (1), the Magistrate may, by order, direct the State Wakf Board established under section 9 of the Wakf Act, 1954 (29 of 1954), or under any other law for the time being in force in a State, functioning in the area in which the woman resides, to pay such maintenance as determined by him under sub-section (1) or, as the case may be, to pay the shares of such of the relatives who are unable to pay, at such periods as he may specify in his order.
How courts have applied section 4
- Section 125 CrPC applies to divorced Muslim women; the 1986 Act is in addition to, not in derogation of, Section 125.1,2
- The 1986 Act is constitutionally valid and the husband's liability for maintenance extends beyond the iddat period.3,4
- Section 4 provides for maintenance against relatives and the State Wakf Board only where the woman cannot maintain herself after iddat.3
- Enhancement of maintenance under Section 127 CrPC is maintainable even if the original claim was laid under Section 3(2) of the 1986 Act.5
- Criminal proceedings related to the 1986 Act have been quashed on compromise, without merits.6
Read the full overviewShow less· 3 paragraphs
The judgements here are mostly about how the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 interacts with other maintenance provisions, chiefly Section 125 CrPC, and about the Act's constitutional validity and scope. The Supreme Court has held that the Act is constitutional and that a divorced Muslim woman may claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after the iddat period, so long as she has not remarried; the Act is in addition to, not in derogation of, Section 125. Another Supreme Court judgement underlined the dignity and financial protection of the divorced woman and held that Section 3 of the Act requires a reasonable and fair provision for her future, extending beyond the iddat period.1,2,3,4
Where the divorced woman cannot maintain herself after iddat, Section 4 operates as a fallback: maintenance may be ordered against her relatives who would inherit from her, and if they lack means, against the State Wakf Board. Courts in these orders have allowed enhancement of maintenance under Section 127 CrPC even where the original claim was laid under the 1986 Act, treating the wrong nomenclature as not binding. A number of judgements concern criminal proceedings under the related 2019 Act on marriage, not divorce, and were disposed on compromises, withdrawal, or bail; these do not engage with Section 4.3,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,6,13,14,15,16
The judgements here do not show any case applying Section 4 on its own terms to determine the quantum or proportion of maintenance payable by relatives or the Wakf Board; the provision is cited only as part of the overall scheme. One judgement quashed proceedings under Section 4 of the 1986 Act after a compromise, without merits. Overall, the sample is dominated by bail and quashing orders in matrimonial disputes rather than rulings on the substantive operation of Section 4.3,6,7,8,10,11,17,12
By court
Outcomes
Judgements applying section 4
Maintenance — Section 125 CrPC applies to all married and divorced women including Muslim women; interplay with Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 (ss. 2(a), 3, 4, 5, 7) and Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019 (ss. 3, 5); non-obstante clause;
DismissedOpenDivorced Muslim woman — entitlement to maintenance under s.125 CrPC — Held: even after divorce and after expiry of the iddat period, a Muslim woman is entitled to claim maintenance from her husband under s.125 CrPC as long as she does not remarry;
AllowedOpenRousanara Begum v. S.K. Salahuddin @ SK Salauddin & Anr., Criminal Appeal Nos. 5164-5165 of 2025, Supreme Court of India, decided 02 December 2025 (Sanjay Karol, J., author; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J.).
AllowedOpenConstitutional challenge to the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 excluding divorced Muslim women from Section 125 CrPC maintenance. The Court upheld the Act, holding a husband must make reasonable and fair provision extending beyond iddat within the iddat period, and that relatives or Wakf…
DismissedOpenIn an application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Court considered charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 regarding domestic violence, dowry, and bigamy. Finding prima facie that detention was unwarranted, the order allowed the petition.
AllowedOpenChief Justice Ramesh Sinha granted anticipatory bail to the applicant under Section 482 of the BNSS in a charge of triple talaq and criminal breach of peace arising from a matrimonial dispute.
AllowedOpen
Show 6 more
Section 528 BNSS quashing application disposed of with directions for trial-court verification of compromise dated 23.12.2025; charge sheet 04.03.2020 and cognizance order 30.11.2020 in Case Crime No. 1338 of 2019 / Case No. 3185 of 2020 (Sections 498-A, 354, 323 IPC; Sections 3/4 DP Act;
Delhi High Court (Girish Kathpalia, J.), CRL.M.C. 5128/2026 & CRL.M.A. 21535/2026, order dated 23.07.2026 — Sh. Mohd. Amaan and Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr. The petitioners had sought quashing of case FIR No.
Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR and complaint in Crime No. 51/2024 dated 30.04.2024 registered by the Mangalore Women Police Station (offences punishable under Sections 506, 498A, 323, 354 and 34 IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry…
DisposedOpendivorced Muslim woman; maintenance enhancement; Section 127 Cr.P.C.; Section 125 Cr.P.C.; Section 125(1)(b); Section 3(2) Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986; Section 5 declaration; Section 4 first proviso; iddat; Family Court jurisdiction; Sections 7(1)(f) and 20 Family Courts Act 1984;
DisposedOpenC.R.M.(A) 1216 of 2026, decided 13/05/2026 by Jay Sengupta, J.: anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS 2023 REJECTED. Underlying case: English Bazar P.S. Case No.
DismissedOpenComplainant challenged the trial court's refusal to let her engage private counsel to assist the prosecution. The High Court held no prior permission is required to assist the Public Prosecutor; permission is needed only for written arguments or independent conduct of prosecution. Impugned order set aside.
DisposedOpen
Pre-arrest bail — Section 4, Muslim Women (Protection of Right of Marriage) Act, 2019 — alleged pronouncement of triple talaq — District Court's rejection of bail application held mechanical, passed without applying its mind to the object of the Act — relying on Rajendra Bhagat v.
DisposedOpenQuashing of criminal proceedings on compromise between parties; inherent powers under S. 528 BNSS (analogous to S. 482 Cr.P.C.); Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, Sections 3 and 4; Case Crime No. 0151/2024, Police Station Madeyganj, District Lucknow; Judicial Magistrate Court No. 37 Lucknow;
AllowedOpenMoh. Javed Halwai and 5 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Outcome: AllowedS.528 BNSS quashing application allowed; sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC (85, 115(2), 351(3) BNS); 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; 3/4 The Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act; Case Crime No. 0274 of 2024, Police Station Fakharpur, District Bahraich; Case No. 9087 of 2026; charge sheet dated 13.09.2024;
AllowedOpenQuashing application under S. 528 BNSS; matrimonial dispute; reference to Mediation and Conciliation Centre; interim stay of criminal proceedings; Case Crime no. 0176/2025, P.S. Thakurganj, Lucknow; Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S.S.; Sections 3 and 4 D.P. Act; Sections 3 and 4 The Muslim Women Act;
Moh. Javed Halwai and 5 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Outcome: AllowedS.528 BNSS quashing application allowed; sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC (85, 115(2), 351(3) BNS); 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; 3/4 The Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act; Case Crime No. 0274 of 2024, Police Station Fakharpur, District Bahraich; Case No. 9087 of 2026; charge sheet dated 13.09.2024;
AllowedOpenSection 528 BNSS; quashing of proceedings, charge sheet and summoning order; Case No. 8283 of 2025; Case Crime No. 266 of 2025; Sections 85, 76, 115(2) BNS; Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; Sections 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act; Police Station Tanda, District Rampur; matrimonial dispute;
Show 4 more
Section 528 BNSS quashing application; Allahabad High Court; cognizance order 27.01.2021; Criminal Case No. 6522 of 2024; Case Crime No. 336 of 2019; chargesheet 08.11.2020; Sections 498A and 323 I.P.C.; Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; Sections 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act;
Bail allowed on parity with co-accused; Junaid v. State of U.P.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15973 of 2026; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; decided 12.05.2026; Case Crime No. 329 of 2025, P.S. Alapur, District Budaun; Sections 140(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) B.N.S.;
Quashing application under Section 528 BNSS (Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 18709 of 2026) by Anas and 4 others seeking quashing of the entire criminal proceeding in Case No. 638/2026, arising out of Case Crime No. 203/2025 (State Vs. Akram and others) under Sections 85, 115(2) B.N.S., 3/4 D.P.
Section 528 BNSS quashing application; Allahabad High Court; cognizance order 27.01.2021; Criminal Case No. 6522 of 2024; Case Crime No. 336 of 2019; chargesheet 08.11.2020; Sections 498A and 323 I.P.C.; Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; Sections 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act;
Related subjects
- Dowry and Cruelty2,39,112