Section 3. Mahr or other properties of Muslim woman to be given to her at the time of divorce
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, a divorced woman shall be entitled to
(a) a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to be made and paid to her within the idda tperiod by her former husband;
(b) where she herself maintains the children born to her before or after her divorce, a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to be made and paid by her former husband for a period of two years from the respective dates of birth of such children;
(c) an amount equal to the sum of mahr or dower agreed to be paid to her at the time of her marriage or at any time thereafter according to Muslim law; and
(d) all the properties given to her before or at the time of marriage or after her marriage by her relatives or friends or the husband or any relatives of the husband or his friends.
(2) Where a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance or the amount of mahr or dower due has not been made or paid or the properties referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (1) have not been delivered to a divorced woman on her divorce, she or any one duly authorised by her may, on her behalf, make an application to a Magistrate for an order for payment of such provision and maintenance, mahr or dower or the delivery of properties, as the case may be.
(3) Where an application has been made under sub-section (2) by a divorced woman, the Magistrate may, if he is satisfied that--
(a) her husband having sufficient means, has failed or neglected to make or pay her within the iddat period a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance for her and the children; or
(b) the amount equal to the sum of mahr or dower has not been paid or that the properties referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (1) have not been delivered to her,
make an order, within one month of the date of the filing of the application, directing her former husband to pay such reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to the divorced woman as he may determine as it and proper having regard to the needs of the divorced woman, the standard of life enjoyed by her during her marriage and the means of her former husband or, as the case may be, for the payment of such mahr or dower or the delivery of such properties referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (1) the divorced woman:
Provided that if the Magistrate finds it impracticable to dispose of the application within the said period, he may, for reasons to be recorded by him, dispose of the application after the said period.
(4) If any person against whom an order has been made under sub-section (3) fails without sufficient cause to comply with the order, the Magistrate may issue a warrant for levying the amount of maintenance or mahr or dower due in the manner provided for levying fines under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), and may sentence such person, for the whole or part of any amount remaining unpaid after the execution of the warrant, to imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or until payment if sooner made, subject to such person being heard in defence and the said sentence being imposed according to the provisions of the said Code.
How courts have applied section 3
- For a Muslim woman married and divorced under Muslim law, both Section 125 CrPC and the 1986 Act apply; the option to proceed under either or both lies with her.1
- Section 3 of the 1986 Act provides a divorced woman a claim for mahr/dower and properties given to her at or around marriage.2
- The 1986 Act is in addition to, not in derogation of, Section 125 CrPC.1,3,4
- A divorced Muslim woman can seek enhancement of maintenance under Section 127 CrPC, and the 1986 Act does not preclude such a claim.4,5
- Where a claim was originally laid under Section 3(2) of the 1986 Act, a co-ordinate bench's treatment of it as an application under Section 125 CrPC does not bar invoking Section 127 CrPC.5
- Courts quashed criminal proceedings involving alleged offences under the 2019 Marriage Act where the parties amicably settled.6,7,8,9,10,11,12
Read the full overviewShow less· 3 paragraphs
The judgements here that engage with the substance of Section 3 of the 1986 Act are the Supreme Court decisions of 2024, 2025 and 2020. The 2024 decision held that where a Muslim woman is married and divorced under Muslim law, both Section 125 CrPC and the 1986 Act apply, the option to proceed under either or both lying with the divorced woman, the 1986 Act being in addition to, not in derogation of, Section 125. A 2025 decision held that Section 3 deals with mahr/dower and other properties given to a woman at the time of her marriage, clearing the way for her to claim back from her husband the properties given, and that the Act must be construed purposively, keeping equality, dignity and autonomy at the forefront. A 2020 decision noted the non-obstante clause in Section 3 must be fairly construed and does not demolish existing rights.1,2,3
Several High Court judgements addressed the relationship between the 1986 Act and Section 125 CrPC. The Orissa High Court held the 1986 Act is not in derogation of Section 125 CrPC, that a divorced Muslim woman can opt for maintenance under Section 127 CrPC, and enhanced her maintenance from ₹8,100 to ₹10,000 per month. In another Orissa case, where the original claim was laid under Section 3(2) of the 1986 Act, the court held that wrong nomenclature was not binding, no declaration under Section 5 of the 1986 Act was necessary, and the wife was not precluded from invoking Section 127 CrPC.4,5
The remaining High Court orders concern criminal proceedings where offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 were also alleged, not the 1986 Act's Section 3 provision. Several such proceedings were quashed on the basis of amicable settlements between the parties. Other orders granted bail, holding that invocation of the 2019 Act's provisions is not sufficient per se to deny anticipatory bail, or disposed of applications with directions for compromise verification, mediation, or appearance before the trial court. One order declined to quash proceedings, holding that the submissions raised disputed questions of fact not adjudicable by the High Court.6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
By court
Outcomes
Judgements applying section 3
Maintenance — Section 125 CrPC applies to all married and divorced women including Muslim women; interplay with Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 (ss. 2(a), 3, 4, 5, 7) and Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019 (ss. 3, 5); non-obstante clause;
DismissedOpenRousanara Begum v. S.K. Salahuddin @ SK Salauddin & Anr., Criminal Appeal Nos. 5164-5165 of 2025, Supreme Court of India, decided 02 December 2025 (Sanjay Karol, J., author; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J.).
AllowedOpenDivorced Muslim woman maintenance; Section 125 CrPC versus Section 3 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986; Family Courts Act 1984 Sections 7(1), 7(2)(b), 8, 20; jurisdiction of Family Court; conversion of Section 125 petition into Section 3 application; non-obstante clauses;
DisposedOpenAbhilasha v. Parkash & Ors., Criminal Appeal No. 615 of 2020, decided 15.09.2020 (Ashok Bhushan J. for R. Subhash Reddy and M. R. Shah JJ.): unmarried Hindu daughter beyond majority, without physical or mental abnormality or injury, not entitled to maintenance from father under s.125 Cr.P.C.;
DismissedOpenSection 528 BNSS quashing application disposed of with directions for trial-court verification of compromise dated 23.12.2025; charge sheet 04.03.2020 and cognizance order 30.11.2020 in Case Crime No. 1338 of 2019 / Case No. 3185 of 2020 (Sections 498-A, 354, 323 IPC; Sections 3/4 DP Act;
In two concurrent revision petitions, the High Court of Orissa held that Section 125 Cr.P.C. applies to divorced Muslim women and is not in derogation of the 1986 Act. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to seek enhancement under Section 127 Cr.P.C.
DisposedOpen
Show 6 more
divorced Muslim woman; maintenance enhancement; Section 127 Cr.P.C.; Section 125 Cr.P.C.; Section 125(1)(b); Section 3(2) Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986; Section 5 declaration; Section 4 first proviso; iddat; Family Court jurisdiction; Sections 7(1)(f) and 20 Family Courts Act 1984;
DisposedOpenComplainant challenged the trial court's refusal to let her engage private counsel to assist the prosecution. The High Court held no prior permission is required to assist the Public Prosecutor; permission is needed only for written arguments or independent conduct of prosecution. Impugned order set aside.
DisposedOpenZafar Ahmed Khan and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Outcome: AllowedAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (Rajeev Singh, J.), decision dated November 3, 2025, in Application U/S 482 No. - 9218 of 2025 (Zafar Ahmed Khan And 3 Others Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another): allowed the Section 482 Cr.P.C.
AllowedOpenBail granted — Mohd. Azam Jaidi released on bail in Case Crime No. 803 of 2024 (Sections 498-A/323/504/506/376 IPC; 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act; 3/5(1) U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act), Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki.
AllowedOpenSajjan Ali @ Shafiq Ahmed and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another
Outcome: DisposedSection 482 Cr.P.C. quashing application disposed of; compromise-verification route adopted; chargesheet No. 01/2023 dated 17.01.2023 and summoning order dated 12.12.2023 by Judicial Magistrate-IIIrd, Lucknow; Criminal Case no. 142659 of 2023; case crime no. 358 of 2022, P.S. Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow;
DisposedOpenQuashing of criminal proceeding on compromise — Criminal Misc. Application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. — FIR No.265 of 2023 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, P.S.
DisposedOpen
Mohammad Shoaib Abdul Gaffar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Officer Old City, Akola and Anr.
Outcome: AllowedThe applicant sought pre-arrest bail in a criminal case alleging harassment and illegal triple talaq under BNS and the Muslim Women Act. The High Court granted pre-arrest protection, confirming a prior interim order, noting that merely invoking the Muslim Women Act is not sufficient to deny bail.
AllowedOpenQuashing of criminal proceedings on compromise between parties; inherent powers under S. 528 BNSS (analogous to S. 482 Cr.P.C.); Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, Sections 3 and 4; Case Crime No. 0151/2024, Police Station Madeyganj, District Lucknow; Judicial Magistrate Court No. 37 Lucknow;
AllowedOpenMoh. Javed Halwai and 5 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Outcome: AllowedS.528 BNSS quashing application allowed; sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC (85, 115(2), 351(3) BNS); 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; 3/4 The Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act; Case Crime No. 0274 of 2024, Police Station Fakharpur, District Bahraich; Case No. 9087 of 2026; charge sheet dated 13.09.2024;
AllowedOpenQuashing application under S. 528 BNSS; matrimonial dispute; reference to Mediation and Conciliation Centre; interim stay of criminal proceedings; Case Crime no. 0176/2025, P.S. Thakurganj, Lucknow; Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S.S.; Sections 3 and 4 D.P. Act; Sections 3 and 4 The Muslim Women Act;
Moh. Javed Halwai and 5 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Outcome: AllowedS.528 BNSS quashing application allowed; sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC (85, 115(2), 351(3) BNS); 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; 3/4 The Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act; Case Crime No. 0274 of 2024, Police Station Fakharpur, District Bahraich; Case No. 9087 of 2026; charge sheet dated 13.09.2024;
AllowedOpenSection 528 BNSS; quashing of proceedings, charge sheet and summoning order; Case No. 8283 of 2025; Case Crime No. 266 of 2025; Sections 85, 76, 115(2) BNS; Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; Sections 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act; Police Station Tanda, District Rampur; matrimonial dispute;
Show 4 more
Section 528 BNSS quashing application; Allahabad High Court; cognizance order 27.01.2021; Criminal Case No. 6522 of 2024; Case Crime No. 336 of 2019; chargesheet 08.11.2020; Sections 498A and 323 I.P.C.; Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; Sections 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act;
Bail allowed on parity with co-accused; Junaid v. State of U.P.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15973 of 2026; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; decided 12.05.2026; Case Crime No. 329 of 2025, P.S. Alapur, District Budaun; Sections 140(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) B.N.S.;
Quashing application under Section 528 BNSS (Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 18709 of 2026) by Anas and 4 others seeking quashing of the entire criminal proceeding in Case No. 638/2026, arising out of Case Crime No. 203/2025 (State Vs. Akram and others) under Sections 85, 115(2) B.N.S., 3/4 D.P.
Section 528 BNSS quashing application; Allahabad High Court; cognizance order 27.01.2021; Criminal Case No. 6522 of 2024; Case Crime No. 336 of 2019; chargesheet 08.11.2020; Sections 498A and 323 I.P.C.; Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; Sections 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act;
Related subjects
- Matrimonial and Divorce2,58,011
- Maintenance and Alimony1,04,616