Disposed
Naveen Kumar Dhyani v. Mission Director National Health and Family Welfare Mission
Uttarakhand HCWPSS/1167/2026
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders…
What the court decided
AI extract
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:UHC:3322
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSS/1167/2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. Mr. Suresh Chandra Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. |
|||
| 2. Petitioner was engaged on contract basis for discharging duties as Block Programme Manager in National Rural Health Mission in CHCs/PHCs, Salt, District Almora in the year 2010, and he is still serving in that capacity. 3. According to petitioner, other similarly situated employees, including District Programme Manager and State Programme Manager were given benefit of increment in remuneration during Financial Year 2010-11; however, that benefit has not been given to the petitioner. 4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the respondents to give increment to him for Financial Year 2010- 2011. |
|||
| 5. Learned State Counsel submits that although benefit of increment is available only to regular employees, but, if what petitioner says is correct, then he can approach the competent authority. |
2026:UHC:3322
| 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, |
|---|
| disposed of by permitting petitioner to make |
| representation to respondent No. 1. If |
| petitioner makes representation to respondent |
| No. 1 within two weeks from today, decision |
| thereupon shall be taken as per law, within |
| four months thereafter. |
| (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 02.05.2026 Mahinder/ |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant relief by way of court direction for salary increment.
Block Programme Manager
Respondent No. 1
Rakesh Thapliyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court