Dismissed¶4
Tinku Sharma v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/3325/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Procedural dismissal: writ petition (WPMS) dismissed for non-prosecution owing to petitioner's absence/no representation; State represented by B.S. Koranga (learned B.H.); coram Pankaj Purohit, J.; decision date 02.04.2026. No statutory provisions, precedents, issues, or monetary quantum appear in the order; relevant only as an instance of dismissal for default, not for any legal proposition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, there being no representation for the petitioner when the matter was called on. ¶4