Disposed
Kalpana Lohumi v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCCRLR/533/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders…
What the court decided
AI extract
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:UHC:750
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| I.A. No. 5 of 2026 In CRLR/533/2024 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. |
|||
| 1. Mr. B. S. Bhandari, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Mukul Dangi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 4. This withdrawal application has been moved by the revisionist for withdrawal of the revision on the ground that parties have settled their dispute by seeking divorce by way of mutual consent. 5. Leaned counsel for the respondents have no objection to this. 6. In such view of the matter, withdrawal application is allowed. The instant criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. |
|||
| (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 10.02.2026 SKS |
Revised Application
State
Respondent No. 2
Rakesh Thapliyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court