Dismissed¶¶2
Shyam Pal v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCABA/1070/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Uttarakhand High Court, Rakesh Thapliyal J. (single Bench): three anticipatory bail applications, ABA No. 954 of 2025, ABA No. 955 of 2025 and ABA No. 1070 of 2025, dismissed as infructuous because the final report was filed on completion of investigation, a fact not disputed by the learned A.G.A.; State represented by Sandeep Sharma (A.G.A.) and Rangoli Purohit (Brief Holder); applicants represented by Gaurav Singh; order dated 09.03.2026; no discussion of merits, no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Upon completion of the investigation and filing of the final report (not disputed by the learned A.G.A.), the anticipatory bail applications stand rendered infructuous. ¶¶2