Single judge disposed of a writ petition challenging a gratuity recovery order by deciding it in terms of a Division Bench judgment from 04.04.2024 without recording detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 323 of 2025 (S/S)
Rajendra Singh Thapa ….......Petitioner
Vs.
Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others …..... Respondents
Present : Mr. Vinod Chandra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Lalit Samant, Advocate for the respondents.
JUDGMENT
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
By means of the instant petition, the
petitioners seek the following reliefs:-
perused the record.
2
Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena; and connected cases.
this fact.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 11.03.2025
Sanjay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant petition should be heard de novo or decided in accordance with the precedent set in Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar SaxenaFollowed¶16
Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena; dated 04.04.2024
Rajendra Singh Thapa
Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
