Criminal revision dismissed as infructuous after the revisionist sought and obtained permission to withdraw it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
| Signatures | |
|---|---|
| CRLR No.920 of 2024 | |
| Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. |
| Mr. Rohit Kumar, learned cou |
|---|
| brief of Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned counsel | for the |
|---|
| revisionist. |
|---|
| 2. Mr. Bhaskar |
Chandra Joshi, | learned AGA |
|---|
| for the State |
|---|
| 3. Learned |
counsel for the revi |
|---|
| permission to withdraw the instant r |
|---|
| 4. Permission is granted. |
|---|
| 5. In view of |
the | aforesaid statement, the |
|---|
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
| 13.11 |
|---|
Ashish Naithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
