Mahendra Pal v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dispensed with arguments and dismissed a C482 application as infructuous on 02.05.2025.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
Single judge dispensed with arguments and dismissed a C482 application as infructuous on 02.05.2025.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:3394 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C482 No.324 of 2020 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. |
|||
| Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for applicant appearing through V.C. 2. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant C482 application has become infructuous therefore, he prayed that the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the C482 application is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
(Ashish Naithani, J.) 02.05.2025 Arti |
Applicant
State
Ashish Naithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court