Dismissed
Arun Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCC482/737/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C482 No.737 of 2019 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. |
|||
| Mr. Himanshu Aswal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V. N. Maulekhi, learned DAG for the State. |
|||
| 3. None is present for the private respondents. |
|||
| 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the proceeding before the trial court has already been disposed of. Hence, the present application has rendered infructuous. |
|||
| 5. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| (Alok Mahra, J.) 01.08.2025 BS |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court