Vishwas Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
A Criminal Misc. Application (C-482 No. 683 of 2015) was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the applicant stated the matter had become infructuous.
A Criminal Misc. Application (C-482 No. 683 of 2015) was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the applicant stated the matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C-482 No. 683 of 2015 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Ms. Stuti Pandey, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the private respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement at the Bar that the matter has become infructuous. 5. In such view of the matter, the present Criminal Misc. Application is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 04.06.2025 Ujjwal |
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court