The court dismissed an application for non-prosecution when the applicant was not present even during the revised call for hearing.
The application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-482 No. 106 of 2016 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. |
|||
| None is present for the applicant even in the revised call. |
|||
| 2. Mr. Rajendra Arya, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the respondent. |
|||
| 3. The present C-482 application is dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|||
| 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. |
|||
| (Alok Mahra, J.) 04.06.2025 Ujjwal |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
Respondent
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
