Applicant sought to withdraw a Section 482 CrPC quashing application; counsel stated the intention at Bar and the High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:UHC:1492
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C482 No.1035 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Ankush Singhal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for applicant. **2.**Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painuli and Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holders for the State of Uttarakhand. **3.**Learned counsel appearing for the applicant made a statement at Bar that he wants to withdraw the present C482 application. **4.**In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present C482 application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|||
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.03.2025 PN |
Applicant
State of Uttarakhand
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
